Use of Administrative Data of Court Statistics in Official Statistics
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31767/su.1(104)2024.01.01Keywords:
administrative data, official statistics, judicial statistics, statistical reporting, justice.Abstract
The article examines the importance of using administrative data of court statistics in official statistics. The relevance of access to administrative data of court statistics is emphasized. The article indicates the tasks performed by forensic statistics. Attention is focused on the potential of such administrative data when using them in official statistics, which is important for improving the efficiency of the judicial system, improving legislation, when making powerful management decisions, etc.
The current state of work of the courts and the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine was analyzed with judicial statistics. It was established that the Supreme Court independently approves the form of statistical reporting and does not submit it to the State Judicial Administration of Ukraine, but publishes it on its own website. The study also found that the State Statistics Service of Ukraine publishes only statistical information on administrative offenses in Ukraine, which indicates that administrative data of judicial statistics are practically not used in official statistics today.
Attention was focused on the relevance of using the latest technologies to ensure the availability of information data on the results of judicial proceedings, and positive steps in this direction, made with the introduction of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System, were noted. It is proposed to involve the State Statistics Service of Ukraine in the automated interaction of this system with other automated, information, information and telecommunication systems of bodies and institutions of the justice system.
The primary tasks aimed at ensuring the effective functioning of the mechanism for the use of administrative data of judicial statistics in official statistics are described, and the stages of such a process are also given and characterized.
The conducted SWOT analysis examined the strengths and weaknesses, as well as opportunities and threats of the process of using administrative data of judicial statistics in official statistics.
Downloads
References
2. Pro zakhyst interesiv subiektiv podannia zvitnosti ta inshykh dokumentiv u period dii voiennoho stanu abo stanu viiny: Zakon Ukrainy vid 03.03.2022 r. № 2115-IX, stanom na 26.12.2023 r. [On the protection of the interests of subjects submitting reports and other documents during the period of martial law or a state of war. Law of Ukraine of March 03, 2022 No. 2115-IX as of December 26, 2023]. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2115-20#Text [in Ukrainian].
3. Osaulenko, O. H. (2017). Ofitsiina statystyka v systemi natsionalnoi informatsiinoi bezpeky [Official statistics in the system of national information security]. Kyiv: TOV “Avhust Treid”. [in Ukrainian].
4. Vyhaniaylo, S. M. (2019). Pravova statystyka [Low Statistics]. Sumy: VD “Еldoradо”. Retrieved from https://dspace.univd.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/e150279b-d3c5-4deb-8324-dd038a9e666a/content [in Ukrainian].
5. Kotelnytska, V. L. (2022). Administratyvno-pravovi formy otsiniuvannia sudiv v umovakh reformuvannia sudovoi systemy Ukrainy [Administrative and legal forms of court evaluation in the conditions of reforming the judicial system of Ukraine]. Naukovyy visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho universytetu. Seriia: Pravo – Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 74, 2, 66–74. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.74.44 [in Ukrainian].
6. Yasynok, M. M. (2020). Do pytannia “efektyvnosti” pravosuddia v Ukraini: analiz ta perspektyvy [The Issue of “Justice Efficiency” in Ukraine: Preliminary Analysis and Prospects]. Pryvatne ta publichne pravo – Private and Public Law, 4, 95–100. DOI: https://doi.org/10.32845/2663-5666.2020.4.19 [in Ukrainian].
7. Osaulenko, O. H., & Horobets, O. O. (2023). Implementatsiia instrumentariiu Smart-statystyky v ofitsiinu statystyku [Implementing Smart Statistics Toolkit in the Official Statistics]. Statystyka Ukrainy – Statistics of Ukraine, 1, 7–18. Doi: 10.31767/su.1(100)2023.01.01 [in Ukrainian].
8. Hinchuk, L. I. (2020). Orhanizatsiino-pravovi zasady zabezpechennia yakosti statystychnoi informatsii pro administratyvni pravoporushennia v Ukraini [Organizational and Legal Principles of Quality Assurance of Statistical Information on Administrative Offenses in Ukraine]. PhD’s thesis. Kyiv. Retrieved from http://nasoa.edu.ua/wp-content/uploads/zah/hinchuk_dis.pdf [in Ukrainian].
9. Yerina, A., Honchar, I., & Zaiets, S. (2021). Statistical Indicators of Cybersecurity Development in the Context of Digital Transformation of Economy and Society. Science and Innovation, 17, 3 (99), 3–13. DOI: https://doi.org/10.15407/scine17.03.003
10. Rol ta znachennia analitychno-statystychnoi roboty u sudovii systemi Ukrainy [The role and significance of analytical and statistical work in the judicial system of Ukraine]. (16.01.2019). Official website of the Seventh Administrative Court of Appeal. 7aac.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://7aac.gov.ua/rol-ta-znachennya-analitichno-statistichno%D1%97-roboti-u-sudovij-sistemi-ukra%D1%97ni/ [in Ukrainian].
11. Smalyuk, R. (07.12.2022). Tsyfry na sluzhbi u pravosuddia: 1639 sliv pro efektyvnist ukrainskykh sudiv [Figures in the service of justice: 1,639 words about the effectiveness of Ukrainian courts]. Koalitsiia Reanimatsiinyy Paket Reform. Retrieved from https://rpr.org.ua/news/tsyfry-na-sluzhbi-u-pravosuddia-1639-sliv-pro-efektyvnist-ukrainskykh-sudiv/ [in Ukrainian].
12. Pro sudoustrii i status suddiv: Zakon Ukrainy vid 02.06.2016 r. № 1402-VIII, stanom na 01.01.2024 r. [On the Judiciary and the Status of Judges. Law of Ukraine of June 02, 2016 No. 1402-VIII, as of January 01, 2024]. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/1402-19#Text [in Ukrainian].
13. Pro ofitsiinu statystyku: Zakon Ukrainy vid 16.08.2022 r. № 2524-IX [On Official Statistics. Law of Ukraine of August 16, 2022 No. 2524-IX]. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2524-20#Text3 [in Ukrainian].
14. Smokovych, M. I. (2022). Zdiіsnennіa pravosuddіa v umovakh voіennoho stanu: do pytannіa zakonodavchykh zmin [Execution of justice in martial law: to the question of legislative changes ]. Naukovyі visnyk Uzhhorodskoho natsionalnoho Universytetu. Seriіa: Pravo – Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law, 70, 450–455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.70.72 [in Ukrainian].
15. Ovcharenko, O. M. (2008). Dostupnist pravosuddia ta harantii yoho realizatsii [Availability of justice and guarantees of its implementation]. Kharkiv: Pravo. Retrieved from https://library.nlu.edu.ua/POLN_TEXT/KNIGI/MonoOvcharenko.pdf [in Ukrainian].
16. Kozakevych, O. M. (2021). Zabezpechennia dostupu do pravosuddia v tranzytyvnykh umovakh [Ensuring access to justice in transitive conditions]. PhD’s thesis. Odesa. Retrieved from https://dspace.onua.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/35b2c4a7-bd00-4330-9a73-bad62f71ab67/content [in Ukrainian].
17. Holubieva, N. U. (Ed.). (2017). Informatsiini tekhnolohii u sudochynstvi. [Information technologies in the judiciary]. Odesa: Feniks. dspace.onua.edu.ua. Retrieved from https://dspace.onua.edu.ua/server/api/core/bitstreams/a2bffedf-4601-4d76-8cf5-1d71d00014bf/content [in Ukrainian].
18. Polozhennia pro poriadok funktsionuvannia okremykh pidsystem (moduliv) Yedynoi sudovoi informatsiino-telekomunikatsiinoi systemy: zatverdzhene rishenniam Vyshchoi rady pravosuddia vid 17.08.2021 r. № 1845/0/15-21, stanom na 12.10.2023 r. [The Regulation on the procedure for the functioning of individual subsystems (modules) of the Unified Judicial Information and Telecommunication System. Decision of the High Council of Justice of August 17, 2021 No. 1845/0/15-21 as of Oktober 12, 2023]. zakon.rada.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/rada/show/v1845910-21#Text [in Ukrainian].
