The COVID-19 Pandemic in Ukraine: Process Evaluation, Opinion Analysis

Keywords: coronavirus, pandemic, non-parametric methods of statistics, seasonality, fluctuation, trend, centered score.


The SARS-CoV-2 coronavirus pandemic has proved to be a real test of survival for modern humanity. The global crisis has affected not only the health care system, but also the entire social sphere. For the second year in a row, the world economy is under stress, and countries around the world are assessing and forecasting the scale of economic losses, trying to determine the size of direct and indirect demographic losses. It’s impossible to coordinate the implementation of anti-epidemic measures and disease prevention without adequate response and support from the population. And this requires an analysis of social behavior, its motivation and attitude to the relevant actions of state and local authorities.

The article considers the current trends in the spread of SARS-CoV2 infection in Ukraine and in some European countries. Seasonal fluctuations and cyclical changes in the prevalence of this disease and the number of deaths caused by coronavirus are analyzed. The 7-day seasonal fluctuations are to some extent explained by the peculiarities of the initial registration of such events in Ukraine. After all, some of the test results and medical certificates of death caused by coronavirus disease are submitted to the relevant authorities with some delay. There is a multi-day registration lag after the weekend, when most instances do not work, so the input information is processed with a delay.

The statistical estimates of expected daily number of infected with COVID-19 virus and deaths from this cause (data of the National Security and Defense Council of Ukraine for March-December 2020 and January 2021) are based on an analysis of these trends in the context of effectiveness of preventive measures from “quarantine in free day” up to a hard lockdown.

The article provides a quantitative assessment of the population's response to anti-epidemic measures of government agencies. Database of research comprised a series of opinion polls within the monitoring “Ukraine under quarantine” and “Assessment of Healthcare”, the sociological group “Rating” for 2020–2021. The results of the statistical analysis of psycho-emotional state of the population during the COVID-crisis showed significant differences in the responses of certain respondents groups by age, gender and place of residence.

Using non-parametric methods of statistics, the level of Ukrainian population trust in international and domestic medical institutions, as well as in information coming from various sources was estimated. It turned out that respondents are almost 20 times more willing to read news from regular Internet resources than from the official website of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine and rely more on WHO data.

In the perspective of further research, a statistical analysis of the demographic consequences of the spread of SARS-CoV2 infection in Ukraine is planned.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Vaktsynatsiia v Ukraini: bariery ta mozhlyvosti (18–19 bereznia 2021). Sotsiolohichna hrupa “Reitynh” [Vaccination in Ukraine: barriers and opportunities. Sociological group “Rating”]. (2021). Retrieved from [in Ukraine].
2. Cherenko, L. M., Poliakova, S. V., Shyshkin, V. S., Reut, A. H., Vasyliev, O. A., & Kohatko, Yu. L. (2020). Vplyv koronavirusnoi kryzy na bidnist: pershi naslidky dlia Ukrainy [The impact of the coronavirus crisis on poverty: the first consequences for Ukraine]. Kyiv: IDSD imeni M. V. Ptukhy NAN Ukrainy. Retrieved from [in Ukraine].
3. Coronavirus epidemic monitoring system. (2020). Retrieved from
4. Kalnysh, V. V. (2020). Rol poshyrennia koronavirusnoi infektsii (COVID-19) u formuvanni stresu ta khronichnoi vtomy u pratsiuiuchoho naselennia [The role of the spread of coronavirus infection (COVID19) in the formation of stress and chronic fatigue in the working population]. Ukrainskyi zhurnal z problem medytsyny pratsi – Ukrainian journal of occupational health, Vol. 16, 3,173–186. Retrieved from [in Ukraine].
5. Otsinka medychnoi sfery (27 lystopada – 1 hrudnia 2020). Sotsiolohichna hrupa “Reitynh” [Assessment of Healthcare. Sociological group “Rating”]. (2020). Retrieved from [in Ukraine].
6. Otsinka medychnoi sfery (24–28 bereznia 2021). Sotsiolohichna hrupa “Reitynh” [Assessment of Healthcare. Sociological group “Rating”]. (2021). Retrieved from [in Ukraine].
7. Otsinka uspishnosti vlady ta reaktsiia suspilstva na epidemiiu koronavirusu ta politychni podii v kraini [Assessment of government success and public response to the coronavirus epidemic and political developments in the country]. (2020). KMIS. Press releases and reports. Retrieved from [in Ukraine].
8. Panyotto, V. Y., & Maksymenko, V. S. (2003). Kolichestvennye metody v sotsyolohycheskykh issledovaniyakh [Quantitative methods in sociological research]. Kyiv: Naukova dumka [in Russian].
9. Trofymov, V. P. (1985). Lohycheskaya struktura statisticheskykh modelei [Logical structure of statistical models]. Moscow: Finansy i statistika [in Russian].
10. Dembitskyi, S. S., Zlobina, O. H., Sydorov, M. V.-S., & Mamonova, H. A. (2020). Stan psykholohichnoho dystresu sered riznykh sotsialnykh hrup v Ukraini pid chas pandemii COVID-19 [The state of psychological distress among various social groups in Ukraine during the COVID-19 pandemic]. Ukrainskyi sotsium – Ukrainian society, 2, 74–92. Retrieved from: [in Ukraine].
11. Ukraina na karantyni: monitorynh suspilnykh nastroiv (15–17 lystopada 2020). Sotsiolohichna hrupa “Reitynh” [Ukraine under quarantine: monitoring of public moods. Sociological group “Rating”]. (2020). Retrieved from [in Ukraine].
12. Ukraina na karantyni: monitorynh suspilnykh nastroiv (28–30 lystopada 2020). Sotsiolohichna hrupa “Reitynh” [Ukraine under quarantine: monitoring of public moods. Sociological group “Rating”]. (2020). Retrieved from [in Ukraine].
13. Ukraina na karantyni: monitorynh suspilnykh nastroiv (12–14 hrudnia 2020). Sotsiolohichna hrupa “Reitynh” [Ukraine under quarantine: monitoring of public moods. Sociological group “Rating”]. (2020). Retrieved from [in Ukraine].
14. Ukraina na karantyni: poriadok ta bezpeka (26–28 bereznia 2021). Sotsiolohichna hrupa “Reitynh” [Ukraine under quarantine: order and security. Sociological group “Rating”]. (2021). Retrieved from [in Ukraine].
15. McKibbin, W., & Fernando, R. (2020). The Global Macroeconomic Impacts of COVID-19: Seven Scenarios. Center for Applied Macroeconomic Analysis. Asian Economic Papers, 20, 1-30. Retrieved from
16. Rawat D., Dixit V., Gulati S., Gulati S., & Gulati A. (2021). Impact of COVID-19 outbreak on lifestyle behaviour: A review of studies published in India. Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome: Clinical Research & Review, January– February, Vol. 15, Issue 1, 331–336. Retrieved from [in English].
17. Our World in Data: Statistics and Research. Coronavirus Pandemic (COVID-19). Retrieved from
18. Toda, А. А. (2020). Susceptible-Infected-Recovered (SIR) Dynamics of COVID-19 and Economic Impact. Retrieved from [in English].
19. Tsang, S., Avery, A., & Duncan, G. (2021). Fear and depression linked to COVID-19 exposure a study of adult twins during the COVID-19 pandemic. Psychiatry Research, Vol. 296. Retrieved from
20. World Health Organization. Regional Office for Europe. Retrieved from

Abstract views: 18
PDF Downloads: 21
How to Cite
Palian, Z. O., Zolotenkova, O. I., & Savchenko, A. S. (2021). The COVID-19 Pandemic in Ukraine: Process Evaluation, Opinion Analysis. Statistics of Ukraine, 92(2), 67-78. Retrieved from