Using International Ranks and Business Activity Indicators for Economic Development Forecasting

  • M. V. Puhachova
Keywords: Index of Doing Business, Global Competitiveness Index, indicators of the business confidence for the economic activities, Economic Sentiment Indicator, Business Tendency Surveys for Enterprises.

Abstract

The majority of countries use several well-known integral indicators for economic forecasting purposes, on which basis these countries’ ranks in the global economic community are computed. Apart from allowing investors to make investment decisions, such indicators and ranks help in forecasting economic development in forthcoming periods. The best known of them is Ease of Doing Business Index and Global Competitiveness Index.

The less known ones are indicators of Business Tendency Surveys (BTS), computed on the basis of data obtained from questionings of enterprise managers in various economic sectors and from studies of consumer sentiments. Yet, specialists tend to use the data from these conjuncture surveys to analyze the current economic situation in a country (total or by industry) and build short-term forecasts.

Apart from the survey indicators depicting quite clearly a situation in the economy, the most popular ones in Europe are Confidence Indicators for enterprises by economic activity, and Economic Sentiment Indicator incorporating the indicators from BTS of enterprises and consumer sentiments. These indicators are computed by the European Commission for EU member countries on monthly basis.

The article shows changes in Doing Business ranks for selected EU member countries and Ukraine. BTS indicators for industrial enterprises (estimate of production capacities; estimate of change in the production orders; estimate of the competitive position of enterprises at the internal market) are analyzed for some of these countries. A comparison of the dynamics of production capacities utilization, business confidence indicators and Doing Business rank is made for Ukraine and Bulgaria. The prognosticating capacities of BTS indicators compared with Doing Business indicator are analyzed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Clements, M., & Hendry, D. (1998). Forecasting economic time series. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press [in English].

A user guide to the Joint Harmonised EU Programme of Business and Consumer Surveys. (February, 2017). European Commission, Directorate General of Economic and Financial Affairs. ec.europa.eu. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/files/user-guide-joint-harmonised-eu-programme-business-and-consumer-surveys_en [in English].

Pugachova, M. V. (2007). Metodolohichni zasady statystychnoho monitorynhu dilovoi aktyvnosti pidpryiemstv [Methodological Background for Statistical Monitoring of Business Activities at Enterprises]. Kyiv: SP “Inform.-analit. ahentstvo” [in Ukrainian].

Doing Business 2019. Training for Reform. (2018). World Bank. www.worldbank.org. Retrieved from http://www.worldbank.org/content/dam/doingBusiness/media/Annual-Reports/English/DB2019-report_web-version.pdf [in English].

Indeks_lehkosti_vedennya_biznesu [Index of Doing Business]. uk.wikipedia.org. Retrieved from https://uk.wikipedia.org/wiki/Indeks_lehkosti_vedennya_biznesu [in Ukrainian].

Schwab K. (Ed.). The Global Competitveness Report 2018. (20108). Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/reports/the-global-competitveness-report-2018 [in English].

Ukraina posila 83 mistse u reitynhu hlobalnoi konkurentospromozhnosti [Ukraine ranked 83th in the Global Competitiveness Rating]. (2018). Retrieved from https://minfin.com.ua/ua/2018/10/17/35293639/ [in Ukrainian].

Metodolohichni polozhennia z orhanizatsii derzhavnoho statystychnoho sposterezhennia “Stan dilivoi aktyvnosti pidpryiemstv”: zatverdzheni nakazom Derzhstatu vid 06.07.2015 №155 u redaktsii nakazu Derzhstatu vid 07.12.2017 r. № 318 [Methodological statements on the organization of state statistical surveys “State of business activity of enterprises”, approved by the Law of the State Statistics Service of 06.07.2015 № 155 in the new redaction by the Law of the State Statistics Service of 07.12.2017 № 318]. (2015). ukrstat.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/metod_polog/metod_doc/2015/155/met_pol_odap_2015_155.zip [in Ukrainian].

Metodyka rozrakhunku indykatoriv dilovykh ochikuvan zghidno z vymohamy rozshyrenoho Spetsialnoho standartu poshyrennia danykh Mizhnarodnoho valiutnoho fondu: zatverdzhena nakazom Derzhstatu vid 30.12.2014 r. № 411 u redaktsii nakazu Derzhstatu vid 07.12.2017 r. № 319 [Methodology for calculating business expectations indicators in accordance with the requirements of the Advanced Special Data Dissemination Standard of the International Monetary Fund, approved by the Law of the State Statistics Service of 30.12.2014 № 411 in the new redaction by the Law of the State Statistics Service of 07.12.2017 № 319]. (2014). ukrstat.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/metod_polog/metod_doc/2017/319/m_ido.zip [in Ukrainian].

Koho vyperedyla Ukraina v reitynhu Doing Business-2019 [Who ahead of Ukraine in the Doing Business-2019 rating]. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/ukrainian/news-46049526 [in Ukrainian].

Time series. Business and consumer survey database files in WinZip format. European Commission. ec.europa.eu. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/info/business-economy-euro/indicators-statistics/economic-databases/business-and-consumer-surveys/download-business-and-consumer-survey-data/time-series_en [in English].

Ochikuvannia promyslovykh pidpryiemstv shchodo perspektyv rozvytku yikh dilovoi aktyvnosti [Expectations of industrial enterprises regarding the prospects of their business activity development]. ukrstat.gov.ua. Retrieved from http://www.ukrstat.gov.ua/operativ/operativ2017/fin/rp/prom/prom_u/arj_prom_2017.htm [in Ukrainian].


Abstract views: 10
PDF Downloads: 19
Published
2018-12-17
How to Cite
Puhachova, M. V. (2018). Using International Ranks and Business Activity Indicators for Economic Development Forecasting. Statistics of Ukraine, 83(4), 34-43. https://doi.org/10.31767/su.4(83)2018.04.04