Statistical Modeling of the National Economy Transformation in the Globalization Context: Institutional Approach

Authors

  • O. V. Zhurauliou National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit

Keywords:

institutes, economic theory, statistical assessment, transformation, system of indicators, dynamism o f transformation theory

Abstract

The article is devoted to the important problem: assessment of national economy transformation from the institutional perspective. It is demonstrated that traditional neo-classical and neo-Keynesian approaches are incapable to fully explain the character of change in macroeconomic indicators in countries with economies that are incomparable by the majority of factors.

It is shown that the institutional setting has dynamic effects for the economic system. As follows from the theory of institutionalism, when the national economic system is under transformation, the society needs to address the triple problem: first, to adopt change and new mechanisms; second, to eliminate negative effects of change and mistakes, and, third, to preserve the values of the past.

A broad range of socio-political factors of the institutional setting, analyzed in economic literature at theoretical and empirical level, is highlighted. They include political regime (democracy or other form of government), economic rights and freedoms, type of ownership, freedom and autonomy of judicial system, effectiveness of public administration, supremacy of law and social stability. Also, performance indicators for education and health care system, indicators of shadow economy and social inequality are accounted for in selected empirical works.

A theoretical model is proposed, which includes index of economic freedoms and number of air flights. The assessment of regression models for countries with the highest index of economic freedom demonstrates that the effective institutes are most effective drivers of economic growth and population’s welfare. However, the reverse statistical impact of index of economic freedom is found for Hong Kong and Singapore; it assumes that the already established and effective institutes are capable to promote economic growth by inertia, irrespective of the model indicators.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Ajemoglu, D., & Robinson, J. A. (2015). Pochemu odni strany bogatye, a drugie bednye. Proishozhdenie vlasti, protsvetaniia i nishchety [Why Nations Fail: The Origins of Power, Prosperity, and Poverty ]. Moscow: AST [in Russian ].

2. Analiz instrumentov otsenky sotsialno-ekonomicheskikhposledstviiplaniruemykh institutsionalnykh reform, monitoring I otsenka effektivnosti ikh realizatsii, razrabotkapredlozheniipo sozdaniiu instrumentalnoi bazy otsenki effektivnosty institutsionalnykh reform. Zvit z naukovo-doslidnoi roboty [Analysis of assessment instruments of socio-economic effects of the planned institutional reforms, monitoring and evaluation of the effectiveness of their implementation, the development of proposals for the creation of instrumentation for evaluation of the effectiveness of institutional re forms. The report on research work ]. (2006). Moscow: Non-profit Foundation for the promotion of economic development and social stability - Center for Economic and Financial Research (CEFIR) [in Russian ].

3. Polterovich, V. M. (2005). Strategii institutsionalnykh reform [Strategies for institutional reforms]. Moscow : TSEMI RAN [in Russian ].

4. Milanovic, B. (1989) Liberalization and entrepreneurship: Dynamics of Reform in Socialism and Capitalism. London : M.E. Sharpe Inc, [in English ].

5. Murrell, P. (2001). Assessing the value of law in the transition countries. Michigan: University Press [in English ].

6. Buchholz, R. (1985). Tssentials of Public Policy for Management. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall Inc, [in English ].

7. Sachs, J. (2003). Institutions Don’t Rule: Direct Effects of Geography on Per Capita Income. NBER Working Paper, www.nber.org. Retrieved from http://www.nber.org/papers/w9490.pdf [in English ].

8. Nemec J., & Wright G. (Eds.). (1997). Public Finance: Theory and Practice in Central Turopean Transition. Bratislava : NISPAcee [in English ].

9. Heritage Foundation. Country Ranking, www.heritage.org. Retrieved from http://www.heritage.org/ index/ranking [in English ].

10. Tobin, J. (1969). A General Equilibrium Approach to Monetary Theory. Journal of Money, Credit, and Banking. Vol. 1, 1, 15-29 [in English ].

Published

2016-09-20

How to Cite

Zhurauliou, O. V. (2016). Statistical Modeling of the National Economy Transformation in the Globalization Context: Institutional Approach. Statistics of Ukraine, (3(74), 11–17. Retrieved from https://su-journal.com.ua/index.php/journal/article/view/103