Advantages and Weaknesses of Indicators for the Assessment of Active Ageing Processes
The article studies the principles for the assessment of active ageing processes as an important component in implementing the Political Strategy on Healthy and Active Longevity of the Population till 2022 and the respective Action Plan. The advantages and weaknesses of the Active Ageing Index (AAI), constructed by the UN European Economic Commission and the Directorate General of the European Commission on Employment, Social Policy and Integration, are revealed through analyzing three core objectives of active ageing and solidarity between generations: employment, social participation, and independent life. By the results of the analysis, the advantages of AAI application include: the usability for monitoring and cross-country comparisons; the possibility to reveal the spheres requiring improvements to assure the high quality life. The weaknesses are as follows: the majority of indicators are based on assumptions; the indicators of old people’s employment do not account for age-specific limitations on the employment in some professions etc. It is argued that the weaknesses of the existing indices can be addressed by clarifying the indicators’ definitions and implementing additional recommendations for interviewing the elderly.
An analysis of AAI in countries of East Europe and Central Asia shows that its average level is 66. Belarus, Turkey and Georgia are the only countries from the studied group with the scores corresponding with this level or exceeding it. In all the other countries AAI is lower than the average. The assessment for Ukraine by the adopted methodology is not possible due to unavailability and shortage of statistical data.
Recommendations on constructing the set of indicators for the assessment of active ageing processes in Ukraine are elaborated, including the four targeted domains: “Employment – contribution of the elderly”; “Social participation – contribution of the elderly through unpaid activities”; “Independent, healthy and secure life”; “Opportunities and favorable environment for active ageing”. The need for improving the statistical data collection is substantiated. The conclusion is made that AAI is an important indicator of the quality of life of the elderly population and an indicator of the effectiveness of social reforms, health care reforms etc. The AAI components can be taken in consideration in constructing the revenue and expenditure profiles of the public budget and local budgets.
Further studies in this field should be focused on quantifying the link between active ageing and national economy growth.
2. Uriad skhvalyv Stratehiiu derzhavnoi polityky z pytan zdorovoho ta aktyvnoho dovholittia naselennia na period do 2022 roku [The Government approved the State Policy Strategy for Healthy and Active Longevity of the Population up to 2022]. kmu.gov.ua. Retrieved from https://www.kmu.gov.ua/ua/news/uryad-shvaliv-strategiyu-derzhavnoyi-politiki-z-pitan-zdorovogo-ta-aktivnogo-dovgolittya-naselennya-na-period-do-2022-roku [in Ukraine].
3. Kurylo, I. O. (2013). Zdorovia i tryvalist zhyttia litnoho naselennia v Ukraini: tendentsii ta deiaki yikh faktory [Health and life expectancy of the elderly in Ukraine: trends and some of their factors]. Demohrafiia ta sotsialna ekonomika – Demography and social economics, 2 (20), 102–115 [in Ukraine].
4. Naselennia Ukrainy. Imperatyvy demohrafichnoho starinnia [Population of Ukraine. Imperatives of demographic aging]. Kyiv: VD “ADEF Ukraina”, 2014. 288 [in Ukraine].
5. Zaidi, A. (2014). Surveying the Aging Landscape. journal-archive.aarpinternational.org. Retrieved from http://journal-archive.aarpinternational.org/a/b/2014/03/surveying-the-aging-landscape [in English].
6. Klimczuk, A. (2016). Comparative analysis of national and regional models of the silver economy in the European Union. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 10 (2), 31–59. Retrieved from http://www.ep.liu.se/ej/ijal/2016/v10/i2/15-286/ijal15-286.pdf [in English].
7. Walker, A. (2002). A Strategy for Active Ageing. International Social Security Review, Vol. 55, 121–139. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=309071 [in English].
8. Zaidi, A., & Howse, К. (2017). The Policy Discourse of Active Ageing: Some Reflections. Journal of Population Ageing. 10 (1). Retrieved from https://www.researchgate.net/publication/313844087_The_Policy_Discourse_of_Active_Ageing_Some_Reflections [in English].
9. Haritonova, O. (2016). Indeks Aktivnogo Stareniia [Active Aging Index]. unece.org. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/pau/age/Active_Ageing_Index/Workshop-2016/06_UNECE_AAI_24_June_Minsk_RU.pdf [in Russian].
10. Chomik, R., & Rodgers, D. (2018). Measuring up? International Indices of Ageing. cepar.edu.au. Retrieved from http://cepar.edu.au/sites/default/files/2018_FS_Measuring_Up_International_Indices_of_Ageing_0.pdf [in English]. 23 июня 2016 г., Минск
11. Vittich, V. G. (2016). Obzor istochnikov dannyh dlia pokazatelei aktivnogo stareniia [Overview of data sources for active aging indicators.]. Proceedings from Data collection for active aging indicators: Vtoroi seminar (23 iiunia 2016 hoda) – Second workshop (June 23, 2016). Minsk. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin [in Russian].
12. Special Eurobarometer 378 “Active Ageing”. ec.europa.eu. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eip/ageing/library/special-eurobarometer-378-active-ageing_en [in English].
13. WHO. (2002). Active aging. Geneva: A Policy Framework. World Health Organization. who.int. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/ageing/publications/active_ageing/en/ [in English].
14. Zaidi, A., & Stanton, D. (2015). Active Ageing Index 2014: Analytical Report. ec.europa.eu. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eip/ageing/library/2014-active-ageing-index-aai-analytical-report_en [in English].
15. Тhe European Innovation Partnership on Active and Healthy Ageing. ec.europa.eu. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eip/ageing/about-the-partnership_en [in English].
16. Active Ageing Index / UNECE, European Commission Directorate General for Employment, Social Affairs and Inclusion, European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research. unece.org. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/population/aai.html [in English].
17. Nunes, J. C. F. (2014). Active Ageing Index and Quality of Life. run.unl.pt. Retrieved from https://run.unl.pt/bitstream/10362/11532/1/Nunes_2014.pdf [in English].
18. Bélanger, E., Ahmed, T., Filiatrault, J., Hsiu-Ting Yu., & Zunzunegui, M. V. (2017). An Empirical Comparison of Different Models of Active Aging in Canada: The International Mobility in Aging Study. The Gerontologist, Vol. 57, 2, 1. 197–205. Retrieved from https://doi.org/10.1093/geront/gnv126 [in English].
19. Baukneht, Ju., Tiemann, Je., & Velimski, Ja. A. (2016). Raschjot pokazatelej aktivnogo starenija na urovne NUTS 3 v Germanii i na federalnom urovne v Rossii [Calculation of active aging indicators at the NUTS 3 level in Germany and at the federal level in Russia]. Proceedings from Data collection for active aging indicators: Vtoroi seminar (23 iiunia 2016 hoda) – Second workshop (June 23, 2016). Minsk. Retrieved from https://www.unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/pau [in Russian].
20. Active Ageing Index 2014. Analytical Report. (2015). ec.europa.eu. Retrieved from https://ec.europa.eu/eip/ageing/library/2014-active-ageing-index-aai-analytical-report_en [in English].
21. Zaidi, A., & Bennett, R. (2017). The Madrid International Plan of Action on Ageing. eeca.unfpa.org. Retrieved from https://eeca.unfpa.org/sites/default/files/pub-pdf/MIPAA%20Report%202017%20HIGH%20RES.pdf [in English].
Abstract views: 70 PDF Downloads: 67