for the Ukrainian Economy Issues of Evaluating Indirect Effects from Foreign Direct Investment

  • О. О. Vasyechko National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit
  • О. M. Motuzka National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit
Keywords: analysis, evaluation, foreign direct investment, attraction of investment, spillover effect, indirect effect.


Theoretical approaches to analysis of indirect effect from foreign direct investment (FDI) on the Ukrainian economy are studied. The process of direct investment is a very dynamic phenomenon: when reacting on the market or political reality it keeps generating new complex organizational forms, thus outpacing the efforts for its theoretical substantiation. Approaches to assessment of indirect FDI effect for a national economy still remains a blank in the above problem.

Indirect FDI effect constitutes an unexpected FDI effect, i. e. an unintended one. In the current economic literature such effect is referred to as “spillover” effect. It means that an investment object is saturated by actions or information (in broader sense) to the extent that their scopes exceed the internal needs of the object and become in a way accessible by other objects, with unexpected (positive or negative) effects for them. Therefore, the principal feature of spillover effect is in its being an uncontrolled effect on a foreign object that has a contact with a direct investment object. This effect can be either positive or negative.

Statistical challenges in assessing spillover effects from FDI occur in many dimensions. The most problematic thing is that spillover effects can hardly be measured in quantitative ways and have rather qualitative manifestations. To be assessed, spillover effects of each FDI need to be comprehensively classified by type, mechanism and vector. As the problems related with assessment of FDI effects are multifaceted, they can be dealt in a multidisciplinary way, with engaging experts in economics, social policy, statistics and econometrics. Once solved, they offer a powerful tool for analysis, control and substantiation of managerial decision making on macroeconomic policy.


Download data is not yet available.


1. Vasyechko, О. (2012) A review of FDI theories: an application for transition economies. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, Vol.2, 89, 118-137 [ in English].

2. Avitabile, C. (2012). Spillover Effects in Healthcare Programs: Evidence of Social Norms and Information Sharing. IDB Working Papers Series No. IDB-WP-380 [in English].

3. Gorodnichenko, Y., Svejnar, J., & Terrell, K. (2007). When Does FDI Have Positive Spillovers? Evidence from 17 Emerging Market Economies. IZA Discussion Papers, 3079 [in English].

4. Angelucci, M., & Di Maro, V. (2015). Program evaluation and spillover effects. IZA Discussion Papers, 9033. Retrieved from [in English].

5. Coase, R. (1960). The problem of social cost..Journal of law and economics, 3, 1-44 [in English].

6. Angelucci, M., & De Giorgi, G. (2009). Indirect Effects of an Aid Program: How do Cash Injections Affect Inéligibles’ Consumption? American Economic Review, 99 (1), 486-508 [in English].

7. Irsova, Z., & Havranek, T. (2012). Determinants of Horizontal Spillovers from FDI: Evidence from a Large Meta-Analysis, Retrieved from http://dx.doi.Org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2012.07.001 [in English].

8. Moffitt, R. (2001). Policy Interventions, Low-Level Equilibria, and Social Interactions. Social Dynamics. S. N. Durlauf, P. Young (Ed.), 45-82. Cambridge: MIT Press [in English].

9. Teyssier, D. (Ed.). (2007). Index des prix et des normes agricoles - 2006-2007. Paris: Synthèse agricole [in French].

10. Gibbons, S., Overman H. G., & Patacchini, E. (2015). Spatial methods. Handbook of Urban and Regional Economics. G. Duranton, J. V. Henderson, W. C. Strange (Ed.). (Vols. 1-5; Vol. 5), 115-168. Elsevier [in English].

11. Ofitsiinyi sait Ministerstva ekonomichnoho rozvytku ta torhivli Ukrainy [The official website of the Ministry of Economic Development and Trade of Ukraine ]. Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].

12. Zakon Ukrainy vid 16.03.2000 r. № 1547 “Pro ratyfikatsiiu Konventsii pro poriadok vyrishennia in- vestytsiinykh sporiv mizh derzhavamy ta inozemnymy osobamy” [Low of Ukraine of March 16, 2000 № 1547 “On Ratification of the Convention on the Settlement of Investment Disputes Between States and Nationals of Other States”] Retrieved from 14 [in Ukrainian].

13. Zakon Ukrainy vid 31.05.2016 r. № 1390-VIII “Pro vnesennia zmin do deiakykh zakonodavchykh aktiv Ukrainy shchodo skasuvannia oboviazkovosti derzhavnoi reiestratsii inozemnykh investytsii” [Low of Ukraine of May 31, 2016 № 1390-VIII “On Amendments to Certain Legislative Acts of Ukraine Concerning the Abolition of Obligatoriness of Mandatory State Registration of Foreign Investments”] Retrieved from [in Ukrainian].

Abstract views: 24
PDF Downloads: 44
How to Cite
VasyechkoО. О., & MotuzkaО. M. (2017). for the Ukrainian Economy Issues of Evaluating Indirect Effects from Foreign Direct Investment. Statistics of Ukraine, (4(75), 20-26. Retrieved from