Non-Financial Reporting as a Tool for Measuring the Social Activity of Domestic Enterprises

  • О. В. Наmкаlо Ivan Franko National University of Lviv
Keywords: non-financial reporting, reporting standards, social activity, social responsibility, stages of enterprise development.

Abstract

The research is devoted to the peculiarities of the formation of non-financial reporting as one of the tools for measuring the social activity of enterprises.

The financial stability and successful business of enterprises is conditional on non-financial indicators and business orientation, ranks, reputation, openness and social responsibility. Non-financial reporting or a CSR report is an effective tool for measuring the performance of enterprises, a basis for the development and implementation of various strategic projects and programs. Information from non-financial reporting allows for assessing the effectiveness of management at an enterprise by economic, environmental and social component, their interdependence and contribution in achieving the main goal, and for subsequent goal setting and more effectively management of change. It means that the report in question serves as the main platform for communicating the results and impacts (positive or negative) of sustainable development. It shows the real effort of an enterprise in creating social, environmental and economic benefits.

However, domestic enterprises do not have sufficient experience in the field of socially responsible business and need to create their own internal concept of corporate social responsibility considering international trends, which determines the relevance of this study

Various international non-financial reporting standards are analyzed; it is demonstrated that the most popular mechanism for regulating non-financial reporting is the Global Reporting Initiative (GRI), which defines a set of indicators measuring the social, ecological and economic component of the economic activity of enterprises The mechanism for making up a non-financial report by phase of the enterprise development is built. The use of the proposed mechanism in making up non-financial reporting will enable to set up an effective link between the enterprise and the stakeholders, and to determine the strategic directions of the enterprise's activities in the context of its development.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Kostyrko, R. O. (2014). Intehrovana zvitnist - instrument sotsialno vidpovidalnoho biznesu [Integrated reporting is an instrument of socially responsible business]. Chasopys ekonomichnykh re form - Time Description of Economic Reforms, 1 (13), 49-54 [in Ukrainian].
2. Korol, S. (2011). Nefinansova zvitnist pidpryiemstva [Non-financial reporting of the enterprise]. Visnyk KNTEU - Herald of KNUTE, 6, 102-113 [in Ukrainian].
3. Kuznietsova, S. A. (2014). Intehrovana upravlinska zvitnist: hlobalni vyklyky ta lokalni rishennia v epokhu noosfery [Integrated Management Reporting: Global Challenges and Local Solutions in the Era of Noosphere]. Ekonomichnyi nobelivskyi visnyk - Nobel Economic Herald, 1 (7), 270-279 [in Ukrainian].
4. Orlova, N. S. (2014). Osoblyvosti pidhotovky nefinansovoi zvitnosti korporatsii [Features of the preparation of non-financial reporting by corporations]. Oblik ifinansy - Accounting & Finance, 3, 65-70 [in Ukrainian].
5. Svirko, S., & Baryshnikova, O. (2015). Zvitnist staloho rozvytku yak zasib vidobrazhennia stanu ekonomiko-ekolohichnoi bezpeky pidpryiemstva [Sustainability reporting as a mean of reflecting the state of the enterprise’s economic and environmental security]. Problemy teorii ta metodolohii bukhhalterskoho obliku, kontroliu i analizu - Problems of Theory and Methodology of Accounting, Control and Analysis, 33 (3), 5-17 [in Ukrainian].
6. Shapoval, V. (2011). Sotsialna vidpovidalnist biznesu v strukturi upravlinnia ekonomikoiu [Social responsibility of business in the structure of economic management]. Dnipro: DVNZ “National Mining University” [in Ukrainian].
7. Eccles, R. G., Cheng, B., & Saltzman D. (eds.). (2010). The Landscape of Integrated Reporting Reflections and Next Steps. Harvard: Harvard Bussines School [in English].
8. Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2011). The Consequences of Mandatory Corporate Sustainability Reporting. Retrieved from: http://ssrn.com/abstractM799589 [in English].
9. Herzig C, Pianowski M. (2009). Nachhaltigkeitsberichterstattung. Betriebliches Umwelt management. - Nachhaltiges Wirtschaften irn Unternehmen, A. Baumast, J. Pape (Eds.). (4th ed.). Stuttgart: Eugen Exceler [in German]
10. Tschopp, D. & Nastanski, M. (2014). The Harmonization and Convergence of Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting Stmdards. Journal of Business Tthics, Vol. 125, 1, 147-162 [in English].
11. The International Integrated Reporting Council (IIRC). integratedreporting.org. Retrieved from http://integratedreporting.org/ [in English].
12. Disclosure topics. Sustainability Accounting Standards Board (SASB). Retrieved from https://www.sasb.org/approach/disclosure-topics/ [in English].
13. Official website of Global Reporting Initiative (GRI). www.globalreporting.org. Retrieved from https://wwwglobalreporting.org/Pages/default.aspx [in English].
14. Standarty GRI dlia pryiniattia investytsiinykh rishen [ GRI standards for making investment decisions]. FinPost.finpost.com.ua. Retrieved from https://finpost.com.ua/news/2148 [in Ukrainian].
15. Directive 2014/95/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of October 22, 2014 amending Directive 2013/34/EU as regards disclosure of non-financial and diversity information by certain large undertakings and groups, eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved from eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/ [in English].
16. National Nuclear Energy Generating Company “Energoatom”. a и a .cucrgoaiom.kicr.ua Retrieved from http://www.energoatom.kiev.ua/en/about/about_nngc/ [ in English].

Abstract views: 87
PDF Downloads: 80
Published
2017-12-20
How to Cite
НаmкаlоО. В. (2017). Non-Financial Reporting as a Tool for Measuring the Social Activity of Domestic Enterprises. Statistics of Ukraine, (4(79), 79-86. https://doi.org/10.31767/su.4(79).2017.04.10