Selecting the Emulation Strategy for Ukraine: Statistical Substantiation of the Comparative Base

Authors

  • V. V. Popova National Academy of Statistics, Accounting and Audit

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.31767/su.3(78).2017.03.07

Keywords:

socio-economic problems, type of the economic development, national macrosystem, emulation strategy, comparative base, institutional and economic di fferences.

Abstract

Ukraine has been undergoing the prolonged crisis resulting in the array of socio-economic problems. The increasing integration and globalization of production processes have resulted in the erected artificial borders between countries, dividing them into rich and poor ones. To bridge the gap in the life standards between rich countries and Ukraine, the emulation strategy should be selected. The essence of the emulation strategy is in copying the methods of economic activities in the countries that are most acceptable for Ukraine; their measures, mechanisms and instruments of influence; legal acts and economic principles, with proper adaptation to the national environment.

The emulation strategy in Ukraine, as a means for addressing socio-economic problems, will be effective, once a comparative base is selected in a correct and substantiated manner. The comparison needs to be made by a set of qualitative and quantitative indicators. Bearing in mind the Ukraine’s location, demography component, historic specifics and mental attitude of its residents, the countries selected for international comparative analysis are Belarus, Poland and France.

The quantitative comparison of the economic performance in Ukraine and the selected countries is made by per capita GDP in international dollars by current exchange rate and PPP; and the total index of physical volume of GDP. The qualitative comparison is made by the criteria: institutional framework for the economy operation, or type of regulation; technologies, technological patterns or the science & technology advancement; endogenous and exogenous orientation of national macrosystems; type of consumption; product of consumption: intermediary (“raw materials and semi-finished products” or “means of production”) or finished (“products and services”).

The study shows that when the quality components are ignored, this will not only go contrary to the interpretation of the economic development from dialectics perspective, but also suppress the quantitative components, because economic development is a process of balanced qualitative and quantitative change. 24 types of the economic development of national macrosystems were statistically substantiated and identified over years of previous studies; the most developed ones have the type varying in the range of 20-24. It means that Ukraine, with 1 type of the economic development, needs to have it changed for 20-24.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

1. Statystyc-hnyi shc-horichnyk Ukrainy za 2015 rik [Statistical Yearbook. 2015]. (2016). State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Kyiv: DP “Inform.-analit. ahentstvo” [in Ukrainian].

2. Statystyc-hnyi shc-horichnyk Ukrainy za 2010 rik [Statistical Yearbook. 2010]. (2011). State Statistics Service of Ukraine. Kyiv: DP “Inform.-analit. ahentstvo” [in Ukrainian].

3. Popova, V. V. (2009). Natsionalna makrosystema yak odynytsia sposterezhennia v statystytsi ekonomichnoho rozvytku [National Macrosystem as an Observation Unit in Economic Development Statistics]. Prykladna statystyka: problemy te-orii ta praktyky. Zb. nauk. prats - Applied Statistics: Problems of Theory and Practice. Collected Papers, 5, 130-139. Kyiv: DASOA [in Ukrainian].

4. Busel, V. T. (Ed.). (2007). Velykyi tlumachnyi slovnyk suchasnoi ukrainskoi movy [Great explanatory dictionary of contemporary Ukrainian language]. Kyiv, Irpin: VTF “Perun” [in Ukrainian].

5. Pokazateli dlia monitorinhaprohressa v dostizhenii Tselei v oblasti razvitiia, sformulirovannykh v Deklaratsii tysiacheletiia: Opredeleniia, obosnovaniia, poniatiia, istochniki [Indicators for monitoring the Millennium Development Goals: Definitions, rationale, concepts and sources]. (2006). Niu-York: OON [in Russian].

6. Nort, D. (1977). Instituty, institutsionalnye izmeneniia i funktsionirovanie ekonomiki [Institutions, Institutional Change and Economic Performance]. (A. N. Nesterenko, Trans.). Moskva: Fond ekonomicheskoi knihi “Nachala” [in Russian].

7. Rainert, E. S. (2011). Kak bohatye strany stall bohatymi, i poc-hemu bednye strany ostaiutsia bednymi [How rich countries became rich, and why poor countries remain poor]. V. Avtonomov (Ed.). (N. Avtonomova, Trans.). Moskva: Izd. dom Hos. un-ta - Vysshei shkoly ekonomiki [in Russian].

8. Smith, A. (1981). An Inquiry into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. Vol. III. R. H. Campbell, A. S. Skinner (Eds.), archive.org. Retrieved from https://archive.Org/stream/wealthofnations03smituoft#pa ge/42/mode/2up [in English].

9. List, F. (1991). The National System of Political Economy. Reprint, lf-oll.s3.amazonaws.com. Retrieved from http://lf-oll.s3.amazonaws.com/titles/315/0168_Bk.pdf [in English].

10. Shevchenko, L. I. (Ed.). (2008). Novyi slovnyk inshomovnykh sliv [New dictionary of foreign words]. Kyiv: ARII [in Ukrainian].

11. Popova, V. V. (2008). Orhanizatsiino-ekonomichnyi mekhanizm upravlinnia rozvytkom natsionalnoi makrosystemy: arkhitektonika ta metodolohiia statystychnoho otsiniuvannia [Organizational-economic mechanism of management of the national macrosystem development: architectonics and methodology of statistical evaluation]. Kyiv: VPD “Format” [in Ukrainian].

12. Valovyi vnutrishnii produkt. Pokaznyky svitovoho rozvytku Google Public Data. Svitovyi bank [Gross domestic product. Google Public Data Global Development Indicators. The World Bank.]. www.google.com.ua. Retrieved from https://www.google.com.ua/publicdata/ explore?ds=d5bncppjof8f9_&met_y=ny_gdp_mktp_cd&idim=country: UKR: BLR: SYR&hl=uk&dl=uk#! ct ype=l&strail=false&bcs=d&nselm=h&met_y=ny_gdp_mktp_cd&scale_y=lin&ind_y=false&rdim=region&i dim=country:UKR:BLR:POL:FRA&ifdim=region&hl=uk&dl=uk&ind=false [in Ukrainian].

13. Popova, V. V. (2010). Statystychna identyf ikatsiia te-orii ekonomichnoho rozvytku: metodolohiia tapraktyka vymiriuvannia [Statistical identification of economic development theories: methodology and measurement practice]. Kyiv: VPD “Format” [in Ukrainian].

Published

2017-09-20

How to Cite

Popova, V. V. (2017). Selecting the Emulation Strategy for Ukraine: Statistical Substantiation of the Comparative Base. Statistics of Ukraine, (3(78), 53–64. https://doi.org/10.31767/su.3(78).2017.03.07