Changes in the Methodology of Socio-Economic Research under the Impact of Advanced Technologies
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.31767/su.4(111)2025.04.09Keywords:
research methodology, research methods, machine learning, artificial intelligence, digital economy, socio-economic analysis.Abstract
Selected aspects of methodological developments in socio-economic research are addressed from a conceptual perspective, with outlining the areas of transformations in methodology, and illustrating the feasibilities of its employment in present-day analytical and forecasting developments. The source base of this study is open analytical documents, reports, methodological and working reviews, and political documents of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development. Relevant scientific developments of various thematic focus were selected by criteria of novelty of technical toolkit, employment of alternative or high-frequency data sources, orientation on applied results for policy setting. An analysis of these materials enabled the author to identify a series of important trends in the methodological developments of socio-economic research, and to show the ways of combining traditional and novel approaches. Technical contained in reports on research results descriptions were used; specific methods were examined, applicable in descriptive diagnostics, identification of causalities, prompt assessment of the current performance, forecasting, and scenario-based modelling. Special emphasis was placed on the integration of algorithmic models with classical statistical and econometric tools, which a central feature of the current methodological transformation. The analysis demonstrated that the methodology of current socio-economic research was undergoing deep changes caused by digitalization, increasing scopes of available data, and the increasing complexity of research objects. There is a transition from the prevalence of classical statistical techniques to ever extending applications of flexible combined techniques of machine learning, big data analysis, scenario-based forecasting. This enables for fuller accounting for non-linear relationships, for more meticulous exploring a wide range of factors and premises affecting the development of socio-economic systems. The employment of algorithmic models and prompt assessment methods reduces the dependence on insufficiently flexible statistical information, and increases the accuracy of analytical conclusions and forecasts.
Downloads
References
Stechenko, D. M., & Chmyr, O. S. (2007). Metodolohiia naukovykh doslidzhen [Methodology of scientific research]. (2nd ed.). Kyiv: Znannia. [in Ukrainian].
Varian, H. (2014). Big Data: New Tricks for Econometrics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 28, 2, 3–28. doi: 10.1257/jep.28.2.3
Mullainathan, S., & Spiess, J. (2017). Machine Learning: An Applied Econometric Approach. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 31, 2, 87–106. DOI 10.1257/jep.31.2.87
Gentzkow, M., Kelly, B., & Taddy, M. (2019). Text as Data. Journal of Economic Literature, 57, 3, 535–574. DOI: 10.1257/jel.20181020
Einav, L., & Levin, J. (2014). Economics in the age of big data. Science, 346, 6210, 715. DOI: 10.1126/science.1243089
Athey, S., & Imbens, G. W. (2019). Machine Learning Methods That Economists Should Know About. Annual Review of Economics, 11, 685–725. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-economics-080217-053433
Bajari, P., Nekipelov, D., Ryan, S., & Yang, M. (2015). Machine Learning Methods for Demand Estimation. American Economic Review, 105, 5, 481–485. DOI: 10.1257/aer.p20151021
Callaway, B., Sant’Anna, P. (2021). Difference-in-Differences with multiple time periods. Journal of Econometrics, 225, 2, 200–230. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2020.12.001
Publications Insights and context to inform policies and global dialogue. OECD. Publications. www.oecd.org. Retrieved November 24, 2025 from https://www.oecd.org/en/publications.html
De Lyon, J., & Dechezleprêtre, A. (19 November 2025). The great dispersion in energy productivity between firms. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2025/24. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/0fa543ce-en
Aristodemou L., Appelt, S., van Beuzekom, B., & Galindo-Rueda, F. (2025). Assessing the relevance of R&D funding towards societal goals: Insights from new data sources and AI-assisted methods. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, No. 2025/25. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bafcdc7b-en
Identifying emerging AI technologies using patent data: A semi-automated approach. (24 September 2025). Technical Paper. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/d17e9a1a-en
Fonteneau, F. (26 September 2025). Advancing the measurement of investments in artificial intelligence. OECD Artificial Intelligence Papers, No. 47. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/13e0da2f-en
Molnar-Tanaka, K., & Shao, K. (27 June 2025). Using AI to measure disaster damage costs: Methodology and the example of the 2018 Sulawesi earthquake. OECD Development Centre Working Papers, No. 355. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b1fe3967-en
Dorville, Y. (10 March 2025). Towards more timely measures of labour productivity growth. OECD Statistics Working Papers, No. 2025/01. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/436ecbb5-en
Murtin, F., & Salomon-Ermel, M. (28 June 2024). Nowcasting subjective well-being with Google Trends: A meta-learning approach. OECD Papers on Well-being and Inequalities, No. 27. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/cbdfb5d9-en
OECD Digital Economy Outlook 2024 (Volume 1): Embracing the Technology Frontier. (14 May 2024). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/a1689dc5-en
Maes, M. (22 July 2025). Monitoring exposure to future climate-related hazards: Forward-looking indicator results and methods using climate scenarios. OECD Environment Working Papers, No. 26. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b9ba6ee0-en
Chalaux, T., Turner, D., & Cassimon, S. (2025). Harnessing the wisdom of crowds to assess recession risks in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1849. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/46880adc-en
Chalaux, T., & Turner, D. (20 September 2024). Doombot versus other machine-learning methods for evaluating recession risks in OECD countries. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1821. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1a8c0a92-en
Monteiro, B., & Dal Borgo, R. (11 September 2023). Supporting decision making with strategic foresight: An emerging framework for proactive and prospective governments. OECD Working Papers on Public Governance, No. 63. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/1d78c791-en
Strategic Foresight Toolkit for Resilient Public Policy: A Comprehensive Foresight Methodology to Support Sustainable and Future-Ready Public Policy. (21 January 2025). Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bcdd9304-en
The OECD Truth Quest Survey: Methodology and findings. (28 June 2024). OECD Digital Economy Papers, No. 369. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/92a94c0f-en
Using private sector geospatial data to inform policy: Lessons from OECD countries on private-public collaborations. (28 November 2022). OECD Regional Development Papers, No. 38. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/242f51b8-en
Corrado, C., Haskel, J., Iommi, M., & Jona-Lasinio, C. (21 November 2022). Measuring data as an asset: Framework, methods and preliminary estimates. OECD Economics Department Working Papers, No. 1731. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b840fb01-en
Measuring the attractiveness of regions. (9 September 2022). OECD Regional Development Papers, No. 36. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/fbe44086-en
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Statistics of Ukraine

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.




