Extremology: Behavioral and Quantitative Aspects

Keywords: extremology, extreme environment, extreme situation, extremologist, extreme risks.

Abstract

The contemporary era features systematic correlations between creating wealth and the emergence of new and even more intensive risks. Globalization processes, volatile geopolitical conjunctures, global climate change, technological progress, which provoke constant and inevitable change in the environment of our existence, aggravate the condition of uncertainty at each level of the social life, thus increasing the social and psychological tensions. The latter constitute another source of risks manifesting in the emergence of extreme environments or extreme situations, apart from conventional risks of human existence. It raises the need for rethinking of established paradigms in psychology and related or other sciences in which the notion “extreme” is in a way explored, and their revision, in order to form a new scientific synergy for methodological support of preparing the population to behavioral adaptation and situational behavior in extreme environments and situations. This determines high importance of extremology as a new applied and interdisciplinary research filed. Considering the social demand, analysis of scientific sources and own experiences of the authors, extremology can be defined as the system for the protection of populations and active counteractions in the conditions of emerging extreme environments and extreme situations. It is argued that to be effective nowadays, such system should be built on methods developed as part of other fields of knowledge, i. e. risicology and statistics, especially the component of extreme risk control and quantitative assessment. But the latter cannot exclude studies of the possibilities for enhancing cross-disciplinary synergy of extremology through involving other methods and practices.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Marty, Fr. (Dir.). (2009). Les grandes problématiques de la psychologie clinique. Paris: Dunod [in French].

Beck, U. (1992). Risk Society: Towards a New Modernity. London: Sage Publications Ltd [in English].

Ranieri, F. (2009). La quête de risques extrêmes. Psychotropes, 15, 115–135. [in French].

Pravdina, L. R. (2004). Vliyanie ekstremalnoy situatsii na dinamiku sotsialno-psikhologicheskikh kharakteristik lichnosti [Influence of an extreme situation on the dynamics of socio-psychological characteristics of an individual]. Extended abstract of candidate’s thesis. Rostov-na-Donu [in Russian].

Servetskyi, I. V. (2015). Ekstremolohiia: psykholohichni zasady novoi haluzi yurydychnoi nauky [Extremology: Psychological Foundations of a New Field of Juridical Science]. Yurydychna nauka – Juridical Science, 3, 179–185 [in Ukrainian].

Nikolov, L. (1980). Povsednevnye situatsii i tsennostnye orientatsii lichnosti [Everyday situations and value orientations of a person]. Ideological process and personality education. Moscow: Progress [in Russian].

Kaposlioz, H. V. (2011). Suchasni pidkhody do klasyfikatsii fenomeniv, yaki ye rezultatom diialnosti osobystosti u nespryiatlyvykh sytuatsiiakh [Modern approaches to the classification of phenomena that result from the activity of the individual in adverse situations]. Visnyk Natsionalnoho universytetu oborony Ukrainy – Bulletin of the National Defense University of Ukraine, 3, 119–125 [in Ukrainian].

Loewenstein, G. F., Weber, E. U., Hsee, C. K., & Welch, N. (2001). Risk as feelings. Psychological Bulletin, 127 (2), 267–286 [in English].

Peretti-Watel P. (2002). Les “conduites à risque” des jeunes: défi, myopie, ou déni? Agora débats/jeunesses, 27, 16–33. Retrieved from https://www.persee.fr/doc/agora_1268-5666_2002_num_27_1_1994 [in French].

Vitlinskyi, V. V. (1996). Analiz, otsinka i modelyuvannya ekonomichnoho ryzyku [Analysis, evaluation and modeling of economic risk]. Kyiv: Demiur [in Ukrainian].

Verchenko, P. I., Velykoivanenko, G. I., Demchuk, N. V., Kompanichenko, O. S., & Shatarskaia, I. F. (2006). Ryzykolohiia [Riskology]. Kyiv: KNEU [in Ukrainian].

ISO 31000:2018. Risk management – Guidelines. www.iso.org. Retrieved from https://www.iso.org/iso-31000-risk-management.html [in English].

Neumann, J. von, & Morgenstern, O. (1980). Theory of Games and Economic Behavior. (3d ed.). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press [in English].

Grun-Rehomme, M., & Vasyechko, O. (2011) Méthodes de détection des unités atypiques. De la théorie à la pratique. Berlin: Editions universitaires européennes [in French].

Tukey, J. W. (1977). Exploratory Data Analysis. Reading: Addison-Wesley [in English].

Rousseeuw, P. J., Ruts, I., & Tukey, J. W. (1999). The Bagplot: A Bivariate Boxplot. The American Statistician, 53 (4), 382–387 [in English].

Gumbel, E. J. (1958). Statistics of Extremes. New York: Columbia University Press [in English].

Gnedenko, B. V. (19430. Sur la distribution limite du terme maximum d'une serie aleatoire. Annals of Mathematics, 44,‎ 423–453 [in French].


Abstract views: 43
PDF Downloads: 37
Published
2020-03-01
How to Cite
Vasyechko, O. O., & Chetverikov, O. F. (2020). Extremology: Behavioral and Quantitative Aspects. Statistics of Ukraine, 88(1), 24-34. https://doi.org/10.31767/su.1(88)2020.01.03